Kurt v. Cox
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Sedgwick district court, division No. 2; Thornton W. Sargent, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, C. J.:
In this action the plaintiffs, A. A. Kurt and F. C. Kurt, asked a recovery of damages as against Clinton Y. Cox, Tipton Cox, F. M. Newcom, Tom Mott, F. M. Hamilton and Lawrence Bowers for misrepresentations and fraud in the exchange of a stock of goods for a tract ‘of land. Plaintiffs entered into an agreement with Clinton Cox whereby they traded their stock of merchandise, valued at about $14,-000, for 9,60 acres of land in Oklahoma and for $4000 cash, *55plaintiffs giving back a note for $2060, secured by a mortgage on the land. A. A.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sallies v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
- Aldrich v. ScribnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Holcomb v. NobleMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Bullitt v. FarrarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Johnson v. GulickNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ware v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Chute v. Old American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
- Topinka v. American Eagle Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
- Hase v. Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931