Legal Opinion

Stybr v. Caflisch Lumber Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1931No. 6882PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lively, Judge:

The chancellor refused to dissolve a temporary injunction restraining defendants from cutting and removing timber from a tract of land, and they appeal.

The motion to dissolve was heard upon bill and exhibits, answers and exhibits, and ex parte affidavits; and it, therefore, becomes necessary to set out at tedious length, and analyze, these pleadings and affidavits. Defendant, Cafliseh Lumber Company, on the one side, and plaintiffs, C. J. Stybr and Thomas Watson on the- other, claim title to the timber involved. Cafliseh Lumber Company (hereinafter called “Cafliseh”) claims…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pardee v. Camden Lumber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Hukill v. GuffeyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Schoonover v. BrightWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Sands v. HolbertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Arbuckle v. McClanahanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1873

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kimble v. Wetzel Natural Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Huffman v. ChedesterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. McGhee v. StevensWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Caflisch Lumber Co. v. Lake Lynn Lumber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API