Legal Opinion

Carty v. City of Ojai

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 1, 1978No. Civ. 49176PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

IBÁÑEZ, J. *

This is an appeal from a judgment by the court sitting without a jury. The plaintiffs (the Cartys) brought an action against the defendant, the City of Ojai, a municipal corporation (the city) praying that two city ordinances changing the zoning on the property owned by them (Carty property) be declared void and that the zoning existing on this property before the adoption of the ordinances be restored. The Cartys prevailed in the court below. The city has appealed.

Statement Of The Case

The two ordinances proscribed the use of the Carty property as a shopping center. Their…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Avco Community Developers, Inc. v. South Coast Regional CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Lockard v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. County of San Diego v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Feduniak v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Corona-Norco Unified School District v. City of CoronaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Delucchi v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Hernandez v. City of HanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  5. City of Glendale v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API