Goldman v. Time, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GEORGE B. HARRIS, District Judge.
On June 4, 1969, plaintiffs filed a Complaint in the state courts of Califor nia seeking damages for invasion of privacy, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and money had and received. The action was properly removed to this court, and on August 20, 1969, defendant Time, Inc. (“Time”) filed its Answer. Time is the only defendant now left in the action. 1
This action arises from the publication in Life Magazine of certain pictures of and text about plaintiffs concerning their sojourn in caves in…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Time, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Reader's Digest Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Fram v. Yellow Cab Company of PittsburghDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Galella v. OnassisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Burnett v. National Enquirer, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Weber v. WoodsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.