Legal Opinion

Cactus Corporation v. State Ex Rel. Murphy

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 9, 1971No. 2 CA-CIV 835PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is from a judgment in the trial court which permanently enjoined the appellant and cross-appellee (hereinafter referred to as the defendant) from displaying, showing or running a motion picture film entitled “Lysistrata”, or any other motion picture film of the same character, on the screen of a drive-in movie operation, so as to be visible from a nearby public highway, and/or right-of-way, and/or the nearby neighborhood, on the basis that such activity is or would be a public nuisance as defined by A.R.S. § 13-601 (1956) , 1 The film “Lysistrata” contains scenes of nudity,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Ginsberg v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. People v. StoverNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
  4. Smith v. RabbArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  5. The City of Phoenix v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Busch v. Projection Room TheaterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Armory Park Neighborhood Ass'n v. Episcopal Community ServicesArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. General Corp. v. State Ex Rel. SweetonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  4. Napro Development Corp. v. Town of BerlinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
  5. State v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API