Legal Opinion
Brenner v. Recognition Equipment Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 26, 1984No. 82 Civ. 1289 (JES)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
'OPINION & ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge.
Defendant, Recognition Equipment, Inc. (“REI”), moves pursuant to Rules 50(b) and 59 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, a new trial. After a three day trial, a jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiffs, William Brenner and Sidney Koslow, finding that the patents at issue were valid and infringed by certain equipment manufactured by REI.
FACTS
Plaintiffs own U.S. Patents No. 3,246,751 (the “Sorting Patent”) and No. 3,609,694 (the “Coding Patent”). Those patents claim means for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Ssih Equipment S.A. v. United States International Trade Commission and Stewart-Warner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Amgen, Inc. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- Precision Metal Fabricators, Inc. v. Jetstream Systems Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1988
- Berger & Gorin, Inc. v. Gary Plastic Packaging Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988