Legal Opinion
Michael Anthony Dixon v. Maddox Kilgore
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided September 1, 2009No. 09-12014UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
Non-Argument Calendar.
1Per curiam
Michael Anthony Dixon, a pro se state pi’isoner, pled guilty to multiple state charges on April 17, 2002. He challenged the voluntariness of his plea in state court proceedings without success, specifically asserting that, when he pled guilty, the state trial court failed to inquire into whether drugs and alcohol affected the voluntariness of his plea. In 2004, he filed a civil rights action in federal court against certain officials and entities connected to the state habeas proceeding, alleging that they falsified a transcript of his guilty plea hearing in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Tannenbaum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Timson v. SampsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Tammy Burke, Royal Insurance Company, Linda Burke Daniels, Plaintiff-Third-Party v. John Smith, Heyl Truck Lines, Inc., Defendants-Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Gulf Coast Building and Supply Company, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No. 480, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dixon v. KilgoreSupreme Court of the United States · 2010