Legal Opinion

Houston v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 13, 1982No. A14-81-241-CRPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. CURTISS BROWN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a conviction of murder. The questions presented are (1) whether the circumstantial evidence presented was sufficient to prove appellant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, (2) whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying appellant’s motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence, (3) whether the definition of “intentional” in the Texas Penal Code is unconstitutional, (4) whether the definition of “intentional” in the court’s charge contained a fundamental variance from the statutory definition, (5) whether certain…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Brasfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Mercado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Faulk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Ex Parte PriorCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dowden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Raspberry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Vasquez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
  4. Vasquez Orona v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Alford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API