Legal Opinion
Mingle v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 20, 1983No. 82-1915PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
429 So.2d 850 (1983)
Samuel MINGLE and Harry Vanhorne, Petitioners,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 82-1915.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
April 20, 1983.
Jon H. Gutmacher, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner, Mingle.
Pamela M. Burdick, Asst. Public Defender, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner, VanHorne.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Marlyn J. Altman, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.
2Per curiam
We deny the petition on the threshold finding that certiorari is inappropriate because the defendant has a full, adequate and complete remedy on plenary appeal. See…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. David Wayne FreundCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Treverrow v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
- United States v. John Doe A/K/A 'Lagas' Robert Tarango LujanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- State v. LozanoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- State v. AcostaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Eutsay v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Harris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Paulcin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.