Legal Opinion

Crespo v. Opah

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided April 26, 2023No. 2:22-cv-02058Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Cedric Crespo, No. CV-22-02058-PHX-DWL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Udell Opah, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Cedric Crespo (“Plaintiff”) has sued the United States (“Defendant”) under the 16 Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) for damages he sustained during an automobile 17 accident involving a federal employee. (Doc. 1-4). Now pending before the Court is 18 Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction or, in the alternative, 19 for partial summary judgment. (Doc. 5.) For the following…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. United States v. Sineneng-SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  3. Zamani v. CarnesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. Keene Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  5. Consejo De Desarrollo Economico De Mexicali, A.C. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API