Wills Point Bank v. Bates, Reed & Cooley
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Van Zandt. Tried below before Hon. F. A. Williams.
1Opinion of the Court
Stayton, Chief Justice.
On the 19th day of January, 1882, Bates, Reed, and Cooley had levied an attachment against Gugenheim & Co. on the property in controversy, and on the 20th day of September, 1883, recovered judgment for their debt against Gugenheim & Co., with a foreclosure of their attachment lien—the judgment directing that the order of sale should be suspended to await the result of this suit.
The defendant bank asserts that on the 17th day of January, 1882, two days prior to the levy of the plaintiffs’ writ, Gugenheim & Co. were indebted to it in the sum of about $6300, and that in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Johnson v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1865
- Kilgore v. JordanTexas Supreme Court · 1856
- Little v. BirdwellTexas Supreme Court · 1858
- Campbell v. SkidmoreTexas Supreme Court · 1846
3Cited by18 opinions
- Caylat v. Houston E. & W. T. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
- Caylat v. Houston East & West Texas Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. RickettsTexas Supreme Court · 1902
- Wood & Kinkaid v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. MillerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.