Legal Opinion

Wills Point Bank v. Bates, Reed & Cooley

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1888No. 2614PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Van Zandt. Tried below before Hon. F. A. Williams.

1Opinion of the Court

Stayton, Chief Justice.

On the 19th day of January, 1882, Bates, Reed, and Cooley had levied an attachment against Gugenheim & Co. on the property in controversy, and on the 20th day of September, 1883, recovered judgment for their debt against Gugenheim & Co., with a foreclosure of their attachment lien—the judgment directing that the order of sale should be suspended to await the result of this suit.

The defendant bank asserts that on the 17th day of January, 1882, two days prior to the levy of the plaintiffs’ writ, Gugenheim & Co. were indebted to it in the sum of about $6300, and that in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Kilgore v. JordanTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Little v. BirdwellTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Campbell v. SkidmoreTexas Supreme Court · 1846

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Caylat v. Houston E. & W. T. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  2. Caylat v. Houston East & West Texas Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
  3. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. RickettsTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Wood & Kinkaid v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  5. Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. MillerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API