Herman v. Ford Motor Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtM. Warshawsky, J.
Plaintiff, Victor Herman, appeals as of right from an order of the trial court granting defendant’s motion for accelerated judgment, holding that plaintiff’s claims were barred by the applicable statute of limitations under GCR 1963, 116.1(5).
The standard for determining whether to grant *642a motion for accelerated judgment requires that all well-pled allegations be accepted as true and construed most favorably to the plaintiff. George v Petoskey, 55 Mich App 433; 223 NW2d 6 (1974). An accelerated judgment is properly entered where the claim is barred because of the statute of limitations. GCR…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Williams v. PolgarMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Connelly v. Paul Ruddy's Equipment Repair & Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Huhtala v. Travelers InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Baker v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Tonegatto v. BudakMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.