Legal Opinion

Frazier v. Department of Labor & Industries

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 7, 2000No. 24000-9-IIPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, J.

Aubry Frazier claims that the Department of Labor and Industries (Department) improperly reduced his disability benefits by the amount of social security retirement benefits that he had been receiving. He argues that because he received a lump sum disability payment rather than monthly benefits, he was not a person “receiving compensation” as RCW 51.32.225 uses that phrase and, thus, there was no statutory authorization for the deduction. We disagree with this contention and with Frazier’s argument that the Department could not make the deduction without first adopting a rule that described…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Harris v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Stuckey v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Stuckey v. Dept. of Labor & Indus.Washington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Ravsten v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Allan v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Harrison Memorial Hosp. v. GagnonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  2. Harrison Memorial Hospital v. GagnonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  3. Frazier v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. Birgen v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  5. Doan v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API