Legal Opinion

Bowser v. Bliss

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1845PublishedCited by 11 opinions

ERROR to the Grant Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

— This was an action of debt brought by Bliss and others against Bowser and another. The suit was founded on the following sealed note: “One year after date, we or either of us promise to pay Henry Bliss, Allison, and Ellis, 150 dollars, value received; provided the firm of Bliss, Allison, and Ellis, do not^make, or sell, or trade, any fanning-mills, within 30 miles of Marion, south of the Wabash river. 30 July, 1840. — Jacob C. Bowser, (seal.) James Story, (seal.”) The declaration avers, that the plaintiffs have not at any time, since the making of said note, made, sold, or traded, any…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rakestraw v. LanierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Wiggins Ferry Co. v. Chicago & Alton RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  3. Cook v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1879
  4. Long v. TowlSupreme Court of Missouri · 1868
  5. State v. Nebraska Distilling Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1890

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API