State v. Nebraska Distilling Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Original information in nature of quo warranto. cited: People v. Sugar Refining Co., 54 Hun [N. Y.], 354; Gibbs v. Gas Co., 9 Sup. Ct. Eep., 553; People v. Chicago Gas Co., 130 111., 268 [7 Ry. & Corp., L. J., 23]; Cook, Trusts, p. 28; Morawetz, Priv.
Read the full summary
Original information in nature of quo warranto. cited: People v. Sugar Refining Co., 54 Hun [N. Y.], 354; Gibbs v. Gas Co., 9 Sup. Ct. Eep., 553; People v. Chicago Gas Co., 130 111., 268 [7 Ry. & Corp., L. J., 23]; Cook, Trusts, p. 28; Morawetz, Priv. Corp., 376, 421, 656; Neustadt v. Hall, 58 111., 172; Craft v. MaConoughy, 79 111., 346 ; Messenger v. R. Co., 36 N. J. L., 413; Angelí & Ames, Corp., 227; Taylor, Corp., 305, 419, 421; Green’s Brice’s Ultra Yires, 416; Chicago L. Ins. Co. v. Needles, 113 U. S., 574 [5 Sup. Ct. Eep., 681]; People v. Dispensary, 7 Lans. [N. Y.], 806; People v. R.…
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
This is an action of quo warranto brought in this court to obtain a forfeiture of the defendant’s corporate franchise. One Woolsey was permitted to intervene in the case. An answer was filed by the defendants and the cause referred to Judge Pound to take the testimony and find the issues of facts, and who made a report as follows:
“First — That the defendant, said Distilling Company, at and prior to the commencement of this suit, was a corporation duly organized under the laws of the state of Nebraska for the purpose of the manufacture and sale of alcohol, spirits, and other liquors, and the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Thomas v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Oregon Railway & Navigation Co. v. Oregonian Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Craft v. McConoughyIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Richardson v. BuhlMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- West Virginia Transportation Co. v. Ohio River Pipe Line Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
- Commonwealth v. DyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Commonwealth v. Kentucky Jockey ClubCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Bishop v. American Preservers' Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Distilling & Cattle Feeding Co. v. People ex rel. MoloneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.