Legal Opinion

State v. T.K.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 8, 1999No. 41731-2-IPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAgid, J.

— The Snohomish County juvenile court denied T.K’s motion to expunge his juvenile record of a 1993 sex offense conviction, reasoning that a 1997 amendment to RCW 13.50.050(11) removed its authority to vacate and seal juvenile sex offense and Class A felony records. T.K. appeals, alleging that (1) the juvenile court should have applied former RCW 13.50.050(11); (2) application of the 1997 amendment violates the ex post facto clauses of the Washington and United States Constitutions; and (3) the 1997 amendments did not remove the juvenile court’s discretion to order vacation and sealing of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matter of Personal Restraint of YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. West Main Associates v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Merrigan v. EpsteinWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Schneider Homes, Inc. v. City of KentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. BreazealeWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. BreazealeWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. TKWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. T.K.Washington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. BreazealeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API