Legal Opinion
Gebhart v. United States
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 3, 1961No. 36590Published
1Opinion of the CourtHerbert, J.
This proceeding was originated under the provisions of Chapter 1313, Revised Code. Although there seems to have been no challenge in the Probate Court by any of the parties as to such procedures in that court and no reference thereto in the journal entry of the Court of Appeals, the majority opinion contains the following:
“In the present case we are not faced with an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien but in a special proceeding in the Probate Court known as an assignment for benefit of creditors. Even though this is a special statutory action it is comparable in every way to a foreclosure…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Robert v. Clapp Co. v. FoxOhio Supreme Court · 1931
- Mahoning Park Co. v. Warren Home Development Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1924
- Sherbondy v. Tulsa Boiler & MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- C. C. Constance & Sons v. LayOhio Supreme Court · 1930
- Seybold v. PitzOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.