Legal Opinion

Boston Elevated Ry. Co. v. Smith

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided March 16, 1909No. 807PublishedCited by 10 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts.

1Opinion of the Court

COLT, Circuit Judge.

This is an action of tort to recover damages for personal injuries. The plaintiff was a passenger on an electric street car operated by the defendant. She had just boarded the car, when, upon the sudden movement of the car in starting, she fell upon the floor, inflicting the injuries complained of. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff.

At the close of the evidence the defendant requested the court to rule as follows:

“(1) Upon all the evidence in the case the plaintiff is not entitled to recover.
“(2) There is no evidence in this case sufficient to warrant the jury…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McGann v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. Byron v. Lynn & Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  3. Timms v. Old Colony Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  4. Sauvan v. Citizens' Electric Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  5. Jameson v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Oregon Short Line R. R. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Otto v. Milwaukee Northern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Wheeler v. Des Moines City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  4. Karsey v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Connor v. Washington Railway & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API