Legal Opinion
State v. Holmes
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided August 21, 2000No. 25189PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*115BURNETT, Justice:
Darryl Holmes (appellant) appeals his convictions for murder and conspiracy, asserting the trial court improperly allowed the State to introduce prejudicial hearsay evidence against him. We agree and reverse appellant’s convictions.
FACTS
Appellant was indicted for murder, conspiracy, and felony accessory before the fact for his alleged participation in the murder and attempted robbery of George Lollis. The facts of this case are fully set out in State v. Fuller, 337 S.C. 236, 523 S.E.2d 168 (1999). Appellant’s alleged role in the crime involved driving Henry Fuller and Bernard…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- State v. PageCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- State v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
- State v. FletcherCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.