Legal Opinion

Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. Lee

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided August 28, 1926No. 511PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMeekins, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). Considering this cause upon the evidence set out in the record, the question presented to us is whether a foreign or an intrastate character attaches to the rail movements of the commodities imported into Wilmington, and there reshipped, in the manner above described, to interior points in the state of North Carolina; that is to say: What is the essential character of the commerce? The correct answer to that question is the law of this ease.

Using for illustration nitrate of soda, the movement of which is eoneededly typical, complainants contend that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. General Oil Co. v. CrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. Sabine Tram Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. SettleSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Railroad Commission of Ohio v. Worthington, Receiver of Wheeling & Lake Erie Railroad CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Southern Pac. Co. v. Van HoosearCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  2. Commonwealth v. HillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Feature Film Service, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1972
  4. Powell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
  5. Commonwealth v. HillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API