Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hill

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1949PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Argued September 27, 1949. Charles F. Hill, Jr., appeals from his conviction of having operated his motor vehicle as a common carrier within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania without a certificate of public convenience or contract carrier permit, contrary to §§ 201(b) and 804 of the Public Utility Law.1

Ontario Land Company, pier 179 North, Philadelphia, is a lumber terminal for vessels arriving from the west coast. Ward Pollock, an investigator for the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, received a complaint about a carrier about to engage in transportation of lumber from pier 179 North,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. SettleSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Standard Oil Co. of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Railroad Commission of Ohio v. Worthington, Receiver of Wheeling & Lake Erie Railroad CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Commonwealth v. WeinsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Commonwealth v. BanksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Commonwealth v. CasertaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Commonwealth v. ReisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API