Sevigny v. Russell
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This is a petition for a writ of mandamus. The petitioner is a citizen and taxpayer of the city of Fall River. He seeks by this proceeding to have declared illegal the election of the respondent Russell as a member of the board of aldermen of the city of Fall River. He makes no claim to that office himself. “The use of the writ of mandamus to try the title to an office, and to put one person out of and another person into an office, is undoubtedly unusual, and opposed to the weight of authority in other jurisdictions. But the nature of the proceedings in mandamus under our statutes seems well…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brooks v. Secretary of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Commonwealth v. FowlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
- Longyear v. HardmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Attorney General v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Keough v. Board of AldermenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bell v. Treasurer of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Morrissey v. State Ballot Law CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Kilroy v. O'ConnorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- State Ex Rel. Pooser v. WesterSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- Hill v. Trustees of Glenwood CemeteryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.