Legal Opinion

State v. Webb

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 26, 1990No. 23165PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was convicted of two counts of murder arising out of an automobile accident. We affirm.

*67Appellant asserts that the trial judge should have directed a verdict on the murder counts because the enactment of S. C. Code Ann. § 56-5-2945 (Supp. 1988), creating the offense of felony driving under the influence (DUI), repealed by implication the offense of murder caused by the operation of a motor vehicle. We disagree.

Repeal of an offense by implication is not favored and will not be applied if there is any other reasonable construction of the statute. State v. Bodiford, 282 S. C. 378, 318…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. MOUZONSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  2. Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. BodifordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. KingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ReidSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  2. Stone v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  3. State v. ReidSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API