Legal Opinion

United States v. $500,000 in United States Currency

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided July 21, 1994No. Civ. No. 3:93CV01388 (PCD)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DORSEY, District Judge.

Pending are cross-motions1 for summary judgment. Absent a genuine issue of material fact, if movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, summary judgment should enter. Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 56(c). Claimants and the government have filed statements of uncontested facts. Local Rule 9(c)(1). No Rule 9(c)(2) statements were filed. The facts stated are found to be uncontested.

FACTS

Gordin is President of Anchor. He is a citizen of Latvia. In April, 1992, he opened an account for Anchor at Fleet Bank. In November, 1992, $1,000,000…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. CoplonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  2. United States v. Roy MandujanoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. United States v. CoplonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. United States v. Robert Martinez, A/K/A "Robert Berk"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. Clarence Stallworth and Johnny SellersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. $500,000 in United States Currency, Boris Gordin Anchor Enterprises, Inc. Saturn Systems Overseas Andrey Kornev, Claimants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API