Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tyler v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 22, 1993No. 92SC150Published

1DissentJustice Lohr

I respectfully dissent to the majority’s conclusion that the trial court’s failure to determine on the record whether Tyler effectively waived his right to testify at trial does not require that his judgment of conviction be reversed. See maj. op. at 142. As set forth below, I disagree with the majority’s reliance on our decision in Roelker v. People, 804 P.2d 1336 (Colo.1991), as support for this conclusion. I also dissent to the majority’s holding that the prosecution established a prima facie case of waiver. I would therefore reverse the judgment of the court of appeals affirming Tyler’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. People v. CurtisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. Roelker v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  4. People v. FondaColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. People v. AfentulSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API