Legal Opinion
Romano v. Romano
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 13, 1987PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, the facts, and as a matter of discretion, by (1) adding to the third decretal paragraph thereof, after the words "$100 per week for five years” the words "or when she becomes employed on a full-time basis, whichever is sooner”; (2) deleting the fifth decretal paragraph thereof and substituting therefor the following provision: "adjudged and decreed, that the defendant shall pay to the plaintiff the sum of thirty-five thousand seven hundred ($35,700) dollars as her share of the husband’s interest in the increase in the value of Berkley…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- O'Brien v. O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Price v. PriceNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Melone v. MeloneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bohnsack v. BohnsackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Massimi v. MassimiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Iarocci v. IarocciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Basile v. BasileAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Chiu v. ChiuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.