Legal Opinion
Massachusetts Manufacturing Extension Partnership v. Locke
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 7, 2010No. Civil Action 09-0788 (PLF)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Massachusetts Manufacturing Extension Partnership (“MassMEP”), Florida Manufacturing Extension Partnership (“Florida MEP”), and Maine Manufacturing Extension Partnership (“Maine MEP”) allege that the Secretary of the United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) has violated the Administrative Procedure Act , 5 U.S.C. §§ 701 et seq. (“APA”), in administering the Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership Program (“MEP program”). On July 29, 2009, the defendant moved to dismiss the plaintiffs’ complaint. While that motion was pending,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Adams v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Texas Alliance for Home Care Services v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Affinity Healthcare Services, Inc. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Adams v. Department of Mental Health of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Affinity Healthcare Services, Inc. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010