Legal Opinion

United States v. Webster

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided June 26, 1979No. Crim. Y-79-060, K-79-059PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOSEPH H. YOUNG, District Judge.

These two narcotics conspiracy cases were consolidated for the purpose of ruling on defendants’ open motions to suppress certain conversations intercepted by court-ordered wiretaps. The defendants in Y-79-060 have either filed or adopted motions seeking to suppress all evidence obtained either directly or indirectly from electronic surveillance of certain telephone numbers on the grounds that the state-ordered wiretap failed to satisfy the requirements of Md.Cts. & Judic.Proc.Code Ann. §§ 10-401 et seq. and the federal wire interception statute, 18 U.S.C. §§…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. DorfmanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
  2. Bell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  3. United States v. SuquetDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
  4. United States v. LyonsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1981
  5. United States v. ErreraDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API