Legal Opinion

Schiavi v. City of Rochester

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 29, 2005No. 2004-805PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGalway, J.

The petitioners, manufactured housing park owner John Schiavi and housing park residents James Barker and William Watson, appeal an order of the Superior Court {Mohl, J.) denying their petition for a writ of mandamus requiring the respondents, the City of Rochester (City) and Melodie Esterberg, Commissioner of Public Works, to: (1) comply with RSA 205-A:6, II and begin direct billing for each individual housing park resident’s water and sewer usage; and (2) make available all *488appropriate deductions and exemptions to the individual residents’ water and sewer bills. We vacate and remand.

Tara…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Franklin v. Town of NewportSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  2. Nilsson v. BiermanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  3. In re JacobsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  4. Appeal of Pinetree Power, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  5. Town of Acworth v. Fall Mountain Regional School DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eaton v. EatonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
  2. Everett Ashton, Inc. v. City of ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API