Legal Opinion

Nilsson v. Bierman

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 29, 2003No. 2003-028PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, J.

The plaintiff, Leif Nilsson, appeals from a jury verdict in Superior Court {Barry, J.) that apportioned fault on his negligence claim between the defendant, Joseph A. Bierman, and Eric Robert Knight, a joint tortfeasor who settled before trial. See RSA 507:7-e (1997). The defendant cross-appeals, arguing that the court’s jury instructions regarding speed were misleading. We affirm.

I. Appeal

A. Facts

The plaintiff was a passenger in Knight’s car when Knight failed to stop at a stop sign and collided with the defendant’s car. The plaintiff sued both the defendant and Knight for his injuries.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McDermott, Inc. v. AmClydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Krieser Ex Rel. Krieser v. HobbsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  4. Carroll v. WhitneyTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Weldy v. Town of KingstonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Kelleher v. Marvin Lumber & Cedar Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  2. Porter v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  3. Carignan v. New Hampshire International Speedway, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  4. DeBenedetto v. CLD Consulting Engineers, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  5. Everitt v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API