Legal Opinion

Haag v. Montana Schools Group Insurance Authority

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1995No. 94-590PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

Ed Haag (Haag) appeals from the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment of the Workers’ Compensation Court determining that he did not suffer a compensable injury arising out of and in the course of his employment. We reverse and remand.

The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the Workers’ Compensation Court erred in concluding that MSGIA’s failure to comply with § 39-71-606(1), MCA, did not preclude it from denying liability for Haag’s claim.

Haag began working as a custodian for School District No. 1 (School District) in Great Falls, Montana, in August of 1982; by October of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Caekaert v. State Compensation Mutual InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Stordalen v. Ricci's Food FarmMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Lovell v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Solheim v. Tom Davis RanchMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Hartfield v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. American Agrijusters Co. v. Montana Department of Labor & IndustryMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Chaney v. U.S. Fidelity & GuarantyMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Taylor v. State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API