Ag Pro, Inc. v. Bernard A. Sakraida
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge:
Today marks the third appellate appearance of this claim for infringement of a patented dairy barn flushing system. This suit for infringement of patent 3,223,070 was originally brought by Ag Pro, Inc., in 1968. A summary judgment on defendant Sakraida’s motion provoked the first appeal. This court reversed and remanded for trial on the merits. 1 The second appellate go-around was an appeal from an adjudication of patent invalidity. We again reversed, but this time remanded specially for a trial court resolution of the defendant’s appellate court motion for a new trial…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Greenspahn v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- United States v. 41 Cases, More or Less, Etc., Naremco, Inc., Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Loyal S. Ledet v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Ag Pro, Inc. v. Bernard A. SakraidaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Roy B. Lloyd, Gladys Lloyd and A. J. Henderson v. Michael Doud GillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Martha Ann Brundage Rozier v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Sakraida v. Ag Pro, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kentucky Fried Chicken Corporation v. Diversified Packaging CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Barbara Jean Johnson, Cross-Appellant v. Offshore Express, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Provident Life & Accident Insurance v. GoelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.