Legal Opinion

Gunkle v. Killingsworth

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 7, 1925No. 26,023PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

The question involved in this controversy is whether rural-credit shares issued by building and loan associations are exempt from taxation.

The plaintiffs are the owners of rural-credit shares of the Mutual Building and Loan Association to the value of $3,500, and of like shares in the Citizens Building and Loan Association of the value of $4,000. In the assessment of 1924 the assessor entered these shares upon the assessment rolls for taxation. The plaintiffs made an application to the board of county commissioners to strike them from…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. WeightmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  2. Comm'rs of Ottawa Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  3. Francis v. A. T. & S. F. RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. City of WellingtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fatzer v. Board of RegentsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  2. State Ex Rel. Tomasic v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  3. Williams v. BaldridgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  4. State ex rel. Tomasic v. Kansas City, Kansas Port AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  5. Duckworth v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API