Legal Opinion

McArdle v. Stewart

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 29, 1968No. 41750PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff James Stewart in his amended petition alleged that defendant permitted arsenic acid which was being sprayed on plaintiff’s cotton crop to drift onto plaintiff’s pasture, causing damage to plaintiff’s cattle. The damage was alleged to be the loss of one 275 pound calf, reduction in value of 12 cows and 11 calves; $184.00 veterinary bill and $90.00 for feed for the cattle. There was no allegation that a written statement of damages had been filed with the State Board of Agriculture.

Title 2 O.S.1961, § 3-82(d), provides:

“ * * * No action for such damages may be brought or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Olmstead v. ReedySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Durham v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Short v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Leonard Farms v. Thompson-Hayward Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Brown v. Rocky Farmers Co-Op., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
  5. Durham v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API