Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State, Department of Corrections v. Chesnut

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 7, 2005No. 1D03-4525Published

1ConcurrenceErvin, J.

I agree with the majority that the final order of the Public Employees Relations Commission (PERC) must be reversed because appellee Chesnut’s case was not pending at the time Dickens v. Department of Juvenile Justice, 830 So.2d 135 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002), was decided, authorizing an appeal from the suspension of a *280selected-exempt employee for conduct which arose while he was classified a career-service employee. In so concluding, I do not mean to imply that Chesnut was required to file a timely appeal from the termination letter of July 2, 1999, of the Department of Corrections (DOC), seeking…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. Department Hrs v. BjmSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  3. Dickens v. Department of Juvenile JusticeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API