Legal Opinion

Bjarsch v. DiFalco

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 7, 1969No. 68 Civ. 4216PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HERLANDS, District Judge:

Plaintiffs have moved for the convening of a three-judge court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2281, 2284 (1964). The motion is granted because a substantial question has been raised as to the constitutionality of a provision of a New York State statute. Appropriate reference to the Chief Judge of the Circuit will be made forthwith.

Plaintiffs are the remaindermen of a trust established under the last will and testament of Hanna Elizabeth Cosgrove, whose estate is subject to the supervision of the New York County Surrogate’s Court. The life beneficiary of this trust…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. McLaughlin v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Zemel v. RuskSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hopson v. SchillingDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1976
  2. Bjarsch v. DiFalcoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  3. Cooper v. MeskillDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1974
  4. Tennyson v. Gas Service CompanyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1973
  5. (PC) Reed v. PradoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API