Legal Opinion
Witschger v. Kamages
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 17, 1949Published
1Opinion of the Court
*1054It is our opinion, upon this record, that the judgment upon appeal correctly declares the intent of the parties as expressed in the instrument and fixes their tax liability thereunder. (Cohen v. Bass, Inc., 246 N. Y. 270, 277; People ex rel. Int. Navigation Co. v. Barker, 153 N. Y. 98, 100; People ex rel. Hudson Riv. Day Line v. Franck, 257 N. Y. 69, 71; Spoor-Lasher Co. v. Newburgh Gas & Oil Co., 280 N. Y. S. 585, affd. 245 App. Div. 329, affd. 269 N. Y. 447, 449.) We find no merit in appellant’s contention that the trial court was powerless to find additional facts than those stated in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People Ex Rel. International Navigation Co. v. BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- People Ex Rel. Hudson River Day Line v. FranckNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Cohen v. E. & J. Bass, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Spoor-Lasher Co. v. Newburgh Gas & Oil Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Spoor-Lasher Co. v. Newburgh Gas and Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.