Legal Opinion

Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Munsell

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 31, 1903PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Assumpsit, for goods sold and delivered. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Oliver H. Horton, Judge presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1903.

1Opinion of the Court

Me. Presiding Justice Waterman

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an action of assumpsit brought by appellees for the agreed price of certain mica washers alleged to have been manufactured for and delivered to the defendant upon its order. The plaintiffs recovered judgment against appellant for $239.99. The principal defense of appellant is based upon its contention that the contract sued upon was ultra vires the defendant, and therefore void, and that the president of defendant had no authority to make the contract in question. Appellant was incorporated for the purpose of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. National Home Building & Loan Ass'n v. Home Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Anderson Transfer Co. v. FullerIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Bank of Minneapolis v. GriffinIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Busenbark v. SaulIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Moser v. KreighIllinois Supreme Court · 1868

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cotton States Belting & Supply Co. v. Florida Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1915
  2. Miami Jockey Club v. Lillias Piper, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934
  3. Williams v. Bankers' UnionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1911
  4. Omaha Wool & Storage Co. v. Chicago Great Western RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Feder v. Forest Hill Apartments, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API