Legal Opinion

Smith v. Karen S. Reisig, M.D., Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided August 13, 1984No. 59561PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HODGES, Justice.

Edith Susie Smith, the appellant and plaintiff below, brought this action against Karen S. Reisig, M.D., and her professional corporation, seeking recovery for injuries sustained during a hysterectomy which she contended was unnecessary. In addition, Ms. Smith alleged the physician was liable for injuries to her bladder when it was “inadvertently” cut or punctured during the surgical procedure.

At trial, Ms. Smith introduced the testimony of the physician, her own testimony, and deposition testimony of a consulting urologist who was initially called in by Dr. Reisig to insure…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Scott v. BradfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  2. Robertson v. LaCroixCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
  3. Condo v. BealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  4. Greenwood v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  5. Bungardt v. YoungerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Sherwood v. CarterIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Wolfe v. AbrahamNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Ketchup v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  4. Alan Andersen v. Sohit Khanna and Iowa Heart CenterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  5. Jennings v. BadgettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API