Jessop v. Hisatake
High Court of American Samoa
1Opinion of the Court
*13Order Granting Motion for Summary Judgment:
Plaintiff’s motion for a summary judgment awarding money damages for breach of the parties’ settlement agreement came regularly for hearing on September 23, 1993. Plaintiff appeared by counsel. Defendant appeared in person.
Summary judgment is appropriate when "no genuine issue as to any material fact" exists. T.C.R.C.P. 56(c); see Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, 477 U.S. 242, 247-50 (1986); Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-24 (1986). Defendant perceives plaintiff’s action as being unfair under presently unfavorable business conditions, but she…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Director General of Railroads v. WilfordSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
- Perma Glass Corp. v. Sasak Corp.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1989
- Stake v. Western Assurance Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.