Rainey v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KATZMANN, Circuit Judge:
The Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (LHWCA), 33 U.S.C. § 901 et seq., creates a presumption of causation: covered workers who suffer a harm that workplace conditions could have caused, aggravated, or accelerated benefit from § 920(a), which presumes, in the absence of substantial evidence to the contrary, that their claims for compensation fall within the regulatory scheme created by the LHWCA. 33 U.S.C. § 920(a). This case calls on us to address the nature of the evidence that an employer must introduce in order to rebut this presumption. We hold that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Greenwich CollieriesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- American Grain Trimmers, Inc., and Frank Gates-Acclaim v. Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, and Marian JanichCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Conoco, Inc. v. Director, Office of Worker's Compensation ProgramsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Filosi v. Elec. Boat Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Rainey v. DIR., OFFICE OF WORKERS'COMPENSATIONCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Stanhope v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Stanhope v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009