Legal Opinion

Smith v. Helvering

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 14, 1944No. 8423PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Associate Justice.

The Commissioner determined a deficiency against the taxpayer for the calendar year 1937. The Board of Tax Appeals affirmed. The facts are not in dispute ; instead, the taxpayer accepts the evidentiary findings of the Board and challenges the conclusion which it draws therefrom that: “The shares of stock owned by petitioner in San-I-Sal Laboratories, Inc. became worthless prior to the calendar year 1937.”; as well as its decision approving the Commissioner’s determination. The sole question of the case is whether the Board applied the correct legal test in deciding…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lucas v. American Code Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Dobson v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. United States v. S. S. White Dental Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Mahnich v. Southern Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Boehm v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Boehm v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  3. Woodward v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1952
  4. Callan v. WestoverDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
  5. Superior Coal Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API