Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Grooters

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided June 8, 1994No. 68,443; CMR No. 9001466Published

1ConcurrenceCrawford, Judge

Since this case should go back for a rehearing, I believe this Court has a responsibility to comment upon a clearly erroneous ruling by the Court of Military Review and reversible error in the military judge’s instructions. I also believe that the majority misses an opportunity to reconcile Issue I with Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 101 S.Ct. 1880, 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981), by misapplying the law-of-the case doctrine. As a result, the majority fails to point out revers*274ible error in Issue II concerning the instructions on attempted unpremeditated murder.

ISSUE I

FACTS

Appellant, Private Maruca,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  5. Arizona v. RobersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API