Legal Opinion

Feuster v. Redshaw

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 4, 1929No. [No. 67, January Term, 1929.]PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParke, J.

On September 6th, 1928, three actions at law for damages growing out of alleged negligence in the operation of two automobiles were begun in the Court of Common Pleas of Baltimore City against Joseph H. Redshaw and Joseph Whitely, the automobile owners. The first suit was by the infant, Frank Feuster, for personal injuries sustained; the second was by the father of the infant for expenses and loss of services growing out of the injuries suffered by the son; and the third was by William G. Scherbel for damages be cause of injuries sustained by himself and to his automobile. In every one of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stewart v. RamsaySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Church v. ChurchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1921
  3. Long v. HawkenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
  4. Kaufman v. GarnerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Kentucky · 1909
  5. People ex rel. Watson v. Judge of Superior CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Margos v. MoroudasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  2. Thomas v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Cummins' Administrator v. SchererCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  4. J. & H. STABLES, INC. v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  5. Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API