Legal Opinion

Niccolls v. Niccolls

California Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1914No. L.A. No. 3276PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

The plaintiffs filed, their complaint wherein they asked that the defendants be compelled to recognize the validity of a certain trust-deed and to be governed by its provisions. A general demurrer to the complaint was sustained without leave to amend, and from the judgment entered for defendants plaintiffs appeal.

It is alleged that Rogers was the administrator of the estate of Eben Smith Niccolls, deceased; that plaintiff, Melinda Clemens Niccolls is the widow of said Eben Smith Niccolls; that the other plaintiffs are surviving children of said decedent an'd are his heirs at law; that Rogers…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tennant v. John Tennant Memorial HomeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Atlantic National Bank v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  2. Estate of HoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Cohn v. KleinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Oakland Scavenger Co. v. GandiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Rowland v. Estate of WanamakerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API