Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of May

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 26, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

The extent of the personal obligation of a mother for the support of a minor or incompetent child does not appear to have been authoritatively defined in this State. The dictum *641in. Matter of Zounek (143 Misc. 827, 828), which is capable of the construction that this is equally the duty of both parents, if given this connotation, is clearly not the law, since it has many times been determined that a mother is entitled to reimbursement from the personal estate of her child for expenditures for necessaries made on its behalf. (See e. g., Matter of Friedlander, 189 App. Div. 90, 95;…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of FriedlanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  2. In re the Estate of ZounekNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of KasnerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
  2. In re the Estate of MayNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  3. Gibson v. MeehanNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  4. In re the Estate of GoldowitzNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API