In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Friedlander
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Resubmission of an appeal by Lillian B. Friedlander, now Lillian B. Leavitt, executrix under the will of Joseph B. Friedlander, deceased, from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county, entered in the office of said Surrogate’s Court on the 11th day of October, 1916, settling the accounts of the executrix herein.
1Opinion of the Court
Blackmar, J.:
The record of the case is long and the accounts intricate and complicated, chiefly for three reasons: First, the power granted the executrix to" continue the business; second, the provision of the decree appealed from, which vacates a final decree made by the surrogate’s predecessor in office, dated April 11, 1907, settling the accounts of the executrix; and, third, the basing of the accounts on the vacated decree. We shall confine ourselves to stating the conclusion at which we have arrived on the points presented to our consideration by the appellant, with a brief statement of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Beardsley v. . HotchkissNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- In re KaneNew York Court of Chancery · 1847
- Haight v. . BrisbinNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Walbridge v. Brooklyn Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation v. HumphrysCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
- In re GorraNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
- Doelp v. DoelpSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- In re the Estate of BlaszkiewiczNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962
- Hill v. ClarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.