Legal Opinion
Gumport v. China International Trust & Investment Corp. (In Re Intermagnetics America, Inc.)
District Court, C.D. California
Decided June 1, 1989No. CV 89-549 PAR, Bankruptcy Nos. LA 84-9208 JD, LA 84-9206 JD, LA 84-9203 JD, LA 84-9209 JD, LA 84-9201 JD, LA 84-9210 JD and LA 86-18220 JDPublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
RYMER, District Judge.
Ex parte applications have reached epidemic proportions in the Central District. One was filed in this adversary action for an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed against defendant and its attorneys for submitting an allegedly false declaration in support of objections to a jurisdictional statement. It is being denied as procedurally improper. Given the tremendous increase in the number of such applications over the past several years, it is appropriate to set forth, in some detail, the reasons why they are nearly…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Omaha Indemnity Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
3Cited by55 opinions
- Cardoza v. Bloomin' Brands, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2015
- Mission Power Engineering Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1995
- Rex K. DeGEORGE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Horne v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, C.D. California · 2013
- United States v. Real Property Located at 22 Santa Barbara DriveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.