Legal Opinion
United States v. Real Property Located at 22 Santa Barbara Drive
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 5, 2001No. 99-57000PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judge:
Claimants Adaline and Darnell Garcia and their attorneys appeal a judgment of forfeiture for the United States. They argue that the district court (1) erred by denying damages for the wrongful seizure of the Garcias’ home; (2) abused discretion by dismissing the attorney-claimants’ claims; (3) erroneously found probable cause for the seizure; (4) improperly admitted Swiss bank records in the probable cause hearing; (5) improperly limited the claimants’ questioning of DEA and IRS agents; (6) abused discretion by refusing to grant the claimants’ motion in limine to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Republic National Bank of Miami v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- McQUILLION v. SCHWARZENEGGERCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Applied Medical Resources Corp. v. United States Surgical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Jalaram, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Real Property Located At 22 Santa Barbara DriveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Timothy Wayne Arnett, United States of America v. Timothy Wayne ArnettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.