Legal Opinion
Stroman Realty, Inc. v. Wercinski
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 14, 2008No. 06-20095PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDITH H. JONES, Chief Judge:
Stroman Realty, Inc. (“Stroman”), a Texas-based company, sought relief in a Texas federal court from attempts by the Commissioner of the Arizona Department of Real Estate to exercise regulatory authority over Stroman’s timeshare sales business. The district court dismissed its *480action, which alleged violations of the Commerce Clause under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Because the federal district court in Texas lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendant, we affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Stroman is one of the nation’s largest advertisers and resale brokers of…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Mullins v. TestAmerica, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Hannon v. BeardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Fiore v. WaldenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Bulkley v. Dept of IndusCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
- Stroman Realty, Inc. v. AnttCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.